{"schemaVersion":"jobsearcher.job.v1","id":"274cb85c0df218a00ab0a739","url":"https://jobsearcher.com/jobs/274cb85c0df218a00ab0a739","canonicalUrl":"https://jobsearcher.com/jobs/274cb85c0df218a00ab0a739","title":"Fraud Engineer (Coding Agent Experience)","description":"Fraud Engineer (Coding Agent Experience) is a remote engineering review track for evaluating production code, debugging traces, and developer-facing AI outputs against real-world correctness standards. Reviewers reproduce failures, write the unit test the model should have written, and explain the fix so the modeling team can target the gap.\nWhy this role matters\nEngineering model quality lives or dies on whether the generated code actually compiles, passes tests, and handles edge cases. AuraOne pairs experienced engineers with the modeling team to grade outputs the way a code reviewer would.\nResponsibilities\nRun and reproduce candidate code outputs in a sandboxed environment for Fraud Engineer (Coding Agent Experience) assignments.\nGrade fraud engineer engineering review solutions for correctness, complexity, idiomatic style, and edge-case handling.\nWrite minimal failing tests that demonstrate the bug a model output missed.\nCompare paired solutions and rank them with a written rationale tied to the rubric.\nTag failure modes (compile error, runtime crash, off-by-one, security issue) with severity scores.\nDocument recurring code-generation failures so the modeling team can target them.\nCalibrate against gold-standard reviews to keep inter-rater agreement above target.\nQualifications\nStrong day-job engineering experience — you can read, run, and debug unfamiliar code for Fraud Engineer (Coding Agent Experience) work.\nComfort writing concise unit tests that capture a single failure mode.\nFamiliarity with at least one of: pytest, Jest, JUnit, Go test, RSpec, or equivalent.\nClear written reasoning — your review note has to convince another senior engineer.\nReliable async availability for at least 10 hours per week.\nPrior code-review or technical-interview-grading experience is a plus.\nExample tasks\nReproduce a generated engineering solution to a coding task, run the test suite, and grade it.\nWrite the smallest failing test that demonstrates a model's edge-case bug.\nCompare two paired solutions and rank them with a written rationale tied to the rubric.\nTriage a security issue surfaced by a model and document the patch the model should have produced.\nNice to have\nOpen-source contributions or a public portfolio that demonstrates production-quality code.\nExperience with the target language's standard tooling, linters, and idiomatic style guides.\nFamiliarity with security-review checklists (OWASP, CWE) and AppSec patterns.\nSkills\nCode review\nDebugging\nUnit testing\nSoftware engineering judgment\nFraud Engineer engineering review\nWork model\nRemote — US-eligible. Remote · Independent specialist contractor. Employment type: CONTRACTOR. Applicants must be authorized to work from US.\nCompensation\n$80 / hr\nApplication process\nApply through AuraOne's specialist intake for role-specific routing and review. Final project scope, schedule, and contractor terms are confirmed before placement.","company":"Auraone Human Data","rawCompany":"auraone human data","city":"Remote","state":"OR","isRemote":false,"isActive":false,"createdAt":"2026-08-06T15:43:08.022Z","occupations":[{"code":"15-1252.00","title":"Software Developers","slug":"software-developers"},{"code":"15-1253.00","title":"Software Quality Assurance Analysts and Testers","slug":"software-quality-assurance-analysts-and-testers"},{"code":"17-2112.02","title":"Validation Engineers","slug":"validation-engineers"}],"industries":[{"code":"541511","title":"Custom Computer Programming Services","slug":"custom-computer-programming-services"},{"code":"513210","title":"Software Publishers","slug":"software-publishers"},{"code":"541512","title":"Computer Systems Design Services","slug":"computer-systems-design-services"}],"jobPosting":{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"JobPosting","title":"Fraud Engineer (Coding Agent Experience)","description":"Fraud Engineer (Coding Agent Experience) is a remote engineering review track for evaluating production code, debugging traces, and developer-facing AI outputs against real-world correctness standards. Reviewers reproduce failures, write the unit test the model should have written, and explain the fix so the modeling team can target the gap.\nWhy this role matters\nEngineering model quality lives or dies on whether the generated code actually compiles, passes tests, and handles edge cases. AuraOne pairs experienced engineers with the modeling team to grade outputs the way a code reviewer would.\nResponsibilities\nRun and reproduce candidate code outputs in a sandboxed environment for Fraud Engineer (Coding Agent Experience) assignments.\nGrade fraud engineer engineering review solutions for correctness, complexity, idiomatic style, and edge-case handling.\nWrite minimal failing tests that demonstrate the bug a model output missed.\nCompare paired solutions and rank them with a written rationale tied to the rubric.\nTag failure modes (compile error, runtime crash, off-by-one, security issue) with severity scores.\nDocument recurring code-generation failures so the modeling team can target them.\nCalibrate against gold-standard reviews to keep inter-rater agreement above target.\nQualifications\nStrong day-job engineering experience — you can read, run, and debug unfamiliar code for Fraud Engineer (Coding Agent Experience) work.\nComfort writing concise unit tests that capture a single failure mode.\nFamiliarity with at least one of: pytest, Jest, JUnit, Go test, RSpec, or equivalent.\nClear written reasoning — your review note has to convince another senior engineer.\nReliable async availability for at least 10 hours per week.\nPrior code-review or technical-interview-grading experience is a plus.\nExample tasks\nReproduce a generated engineering solution to a coding task, run the test suite, and grade it.\nWrite the smallest failing test that demonstrates a model's edge-case bug.\nCompare two paired solutions and rank them with a written rationale tied to the rubric.\nTriage a security issue surfaced by a model and document the patch the model should have produced.\nNice to have\nOpen-source contributions or a public portfolio that demonstrates production-quality code.\nExperience with the target language's standard tooling, linters, and idiomatic style guides.\nFamiliarity with security-review checklists (OWASP, CWE) and AppSec patterns.\nSkills\nCode review\nDebugging\nUnit testing\nSoftware engineering judgment\nFraud Engineer engineering review\nWork model\nRemote — US-eligible. Remote · Independent specialist contractor. Employment type: CONTRACTOR. Applicants must be authorized to work from US.\nCompensation\n$80 / hr\nApplication process\nApply through AuraOne's specialist intake for role-specific routing and review. Final project scope, schedule, and contractor terms are confirmed before placement.","datePosted":"2026-08-06T15:43:08.022Z","dateModified":"2026-08-06T15:43:08.022Z","hiringOrganization":{"@type":"Organization","name":"Auraone Human Data","sameAs":"https://jobsearcher.com"},"jobLocation":{"@type":"Place","address":{"@type":"PostalAddress","addressLocality":"Remote","addressRegion":"OR","addressCountry":"US"}},"identifier":{"@type":"PropertyValue","name":"JobSearcher","value":"274cb85c0df218a00ab0a739"},"url":"https://jobsearcher.com/jobs/274cb85c0df218a00ab0a739"}}